Moderators General , Prelates , Magistrates. Post by You, sir, name?

I came up with this: The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. I mean, I agree that the forumla is flawed, but I disagree on where the flaws start.

## Dating Pools - explain xkcd

I think the flaws start well out of what normal human lifespan is.. If someone who's wants to date someone who's 62, I'm sure as fuck not going to stop them. People who've reached can pretty much do whatever the fuck they want, provided they aren't breaking any laws outside of drug ones. If someone wants to continue doing coke every day, I'm not going to stop it. The shock'll probably kill'em. Last edited by SecondTalon on Fri May 07, 5: I want to write a DnD campaign and play it by myself and DM it myself.

I have been informed that this is called writing a book. If you like my words sign up for my newsletter, Airport Tattoo Parlour: But then i also don't have a problem with a 50 year old dating a 20 year old, so maybe my view is just skewed in general. As in, determining if the older party is acting in a potentially predatory manor based on the naivety of the younger.

So the fact that the range gets pretty large starting somewhere around is based on people past their mids having enough life under their belt to make good decisions for themselves. And I also like that the current formula does work at the bottom edge of the range where anything that is actually "dating" typically starts; basically "13 is too young, and should keep more or less in their grade level.

I'll tell you what you can do with your autoerotic anal penetration, young Cane, you can shove it up y I don't have a problem with a 50 year old dating a 32 year old. When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. Not to see people as prizes you compete for? What's wrong with a 60 year old dating a 37 year old?

Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research. Because you have achieved, against all possible odds, the mindset of a normal rational human being. You haven't done anything worthy of a prize. To reiterate something said by a certain banned person: It's like "I could've raped my girlfriend, but I didn't! That makes me a nice person!

You are giving me the tools to sodomize my vast imagination, and for this I am grateful. For me, at least, dating 10 years past your age is a little bit odd. I, uhm, think your definition of normal is wrong. That mindset is definitely not the norm. Nevermind, I'm bad at grammar! Keep in mind that this formula is to find creepiness, not legality. As long as it's not illegal, it's not creepy for anyone to date anyone? Please keep in mind that I'm not putting forward a point of view or attacking anyone's elses.

I'm just asking if creepiness is irrelevant to the age, as long as it's past the age of consent.

## Do women on OkCupid follow the Standard Creepiness Rule?

Most people already seem to agree that it's alright for a 16 year old to date a 15 year old, but no one will agree it's alright for a 40 year old to date a 15 year old. The title-text mentions that Randall made a chart of his own prospective dating pool as he gets older and was depressed by the results. A dating pool show how many possible partners you can choose from.

As you get older, fewer of these will be single. But as he later shows in Dating Pools , the age is not the problem Each straight couple needs to include one of the x males and one of the n-x females so there are x n-x possible ways of combining one of each.

- Navigation menu.
- Do women on OkCupid follow the Standard Creepiness Rule? | Dr. Randal S. Olson.
- ;
- Categories!
- what do i need to hook up subs and amp.
- .

Each gay couple needs to include either two males or two females. To choose two males, we can start with any of the x males and choose any of the x-1 remaining males. However, that counts each possible pairing twice. To avoid double counting the possible couples, we therefore need to divide that total by 2.

- xkcd | Date By Number?
- Xkcd dating pool graph.
- Xkcd dating pool graph;

As a worked example, for Firefly, of the 9 principal cast, 5 are men and 4 are women. If all were gay, there would be 16 possible hook-ups; if all were straight, there would be There is a typo in his formula for gay casts. Notice the x-n term. This also the small implication that "Queer as Folk" was so dull that Randall produced this equation to occupy his mind during it.

I often find my mind wandering while sat watching soaps with my other half. The first equation can also be understood more simply as the total number of possible pairings, minus the number of straight ones. I think all genders being constant isn't really an assumption of the graph. Obviously the graph only works for a single moment in time in a TV show, since the cast changes over time with the plot of the show such as when people die in the show.

The graph already needs to be re-drawn every time someone enters or leaves the cast. For the data we're tracking, a sex change operation is the same as, for example, a man leaving the show and a woman subsequently entering it. Sure, you could then also say that the cast being constant is an assumption of the graph, but that's not really accurate either. The graph simply doesn't observe the passage of time. You'd have to add a time axis for that, making the graph three-dimensional.

### Starting from zero, a data analyst learns to date.

I think a better way to explain the gay pairing equation would be to look at it like this: Then substract x n-x which is the equation for all straight pairings. Hope I'm editing correctly. It actually comes out that if each individual's gender is chosen randomly, the expected value for straight casts and for gay casts is the same not too hard to prove via induction.

It's 'cause you're dumb. Real-life prospective-pairing curves over things like age can get depressing.